Sorry for almost disappearing from our ten plus years presence on the Internet as one of the "web ring" of interconnected www.MiningMagazines.com. We were totally hack attacked three years ago. At first, the thought that 500 a day unwanted links to spoofing and phishing sites, almost all from Russia, China, the Ukraine, were political. Now we know the fraudulent disinformation campaign was all about censoring and destroying a healthy publishing business through the theft of readers "eyeballs" looking for valid "free" information by misdirecting to a similar URL.
This disruption is the reason we are making a comeback by presenting our copyright protected material in locked Adobe Acrobat PDFs that contain contact information on the last page. This answer also is an on-line safety feature to validate the authenticity of the writer and the readers who make it all the way through to an e-mail address to respond.
Of course, Adobe PDFs take longer to load than a Twitter Tweet, but sixty years experience in the business of publishing supply side information on mineral properties and projects demands the due diligence study into geological and mining engineering reports. We know very that to "sell" a valid mine in the Information Age requires volumes of information delivered with a "paper trail" more substantial than a brokers phone call.
Our almost 20 plus years web presence experience on the Internet of the "web ring" of interconnected www.MiningMagazines.com, was totally hack attacked three years ago. At first we thought that 500 a day unwanted links to spoofing and phishing sites almost all from Russia, China, the Ukraine, were political. Now we know the disinformation campaign destroying a healthy publishing business was all for the theft of readers "eyeballs" looking for valid "free" information how to handle a "tricky" investment in the misunderstood mineral supply side, or whatever is actually left of a healthy mining finance side.
This is the reason we are making a comeback by presenting our copyright protected material in locked Adobe Acrobat PDFs that contain contact information on on the last page. This is an on-line safety feature to validate the authenticity of the writer, and the reader who makes it all the way through to an e-mail address to respond.
Of course it takes longer to load than a Twitter Tweet, but sixty years experience in the business of publishing supply side information on mineral properties and projects demands the due diligence study into geological and mining engineering reports. We also know that to "sell" a valid mine in the Information Age requires a lot of Information delivered in a "paper trail" document more substantial than a brokers phone call.
Here is a 'rock solid' project based on selling product, instead of 'paper'.
Click the cover to read protected information>>>
* FoamKrete is a non-toxic natural (unpatentable) mix of naturally soluble Nano Alumina powder (Al2O3) with a very pure Nano Silica sand aggregate (Sio2) locked into Oregon's Table Mountain in a very rare earth, and uniform sill deposit of Nepheline Syenite being offered at $10 per in-place ton
* FoamKrete's natural chemistry is almost the exact same as nepheline syenite selling for $250 per ton when ground down to face powder -325 fineness in China, where the 3D printing of houses with a pumpable CLC for $5,000 was pioneered. Russia just released information that they have been using the world's largest nepheline syenite deposit to also print houses for $10,000 which will work well with Tesla's new solar tile roof.
* FoamKrete has recently been proven as an affordable after mixture to ordinary cement that expands output from a mixer, which may be simply pumped on a building site into "yeast bread pan forms" for curing, and tilting up as small house walls that also happen to be Class One Wildfire protected, with a 'R' value of twice that of the popular cotton candy "pink" stuff found in big box hardware stores.
Given that the cyclic trends of "for real" precious metals are so out of sync with the deflating "market values" of our strong (?) stock markets boosted by the confidence of a strong (?) USD.
Publishing such First Amendment opinions as an economic awareness warning brought about a hack attack three years ago. This 9-page PDF white paper was the first in a 'real news' recovery attempt win back a readership that was maliciously misdirected.
As our advertising revenue stream has also declined, the direction this publishing company is to combine "notebook chapters" into a "for real" book distributed by, as CODE-Yellow Chrysanthemum, shown on the banner below leading through to BannerBooks.com.
 |
|---|
 |
Mineral Entry Mining Rights in Today's Marketplace What is Correct: > The US Mining Law of 1872 concerning mineral entry has always prevailed, clear up through the U.S. Supreme Courts, that valid deposits of locatable minerals are indeed "real property" subject only to the endorsement of the U.S. publics stake in the financial state of the nation. See Wikipedia's General_Mining_Act_of_1872 for background on this. > The only things wrong with US Mining Law of 1872, as far as citizen taxpayers should be concerned, was that: 1) The provision to purchase the surface rights, just as under the Homestead Act, and Timber Culture Acts of that era, for a then-extravagant $2.50 per acre, was brought to a happy excessive halt twenty years ago, for only benefiting special interest groups, including many foreign corporations, that had nothing to do with American mining. Or farming, or logging, or salmon fishing. The winners of this bargain hunt had been real estate related as private hunting and fishing lodges, or foreign owned resorts. Just as what happened in Las Vegas. Or trading the patents on non-timber land back to the USFS in exchange for outside the boundary units of "ready to harvest" tracts of trees. 2) And the unrealistic battle of multinational mega-corps concerning establishing a mining royalty, somewhat similar to what is found in competitive nations, is without merit. The State of Alaska Department of Lands, along with a claims rental payment, has a reasonable three percent royalty payment after the first three million. As many Alaskan small mining claims owners have a long-term percentage royalty payment that is next to impossible to collect without having a valid umpire assay from a smelter in Asia, this government "regulation" is very much appreciated. Provided, that is if the ADL counter clerks are honest, or biased and bright enough to make personal decisions that have only benefited in Canadian Interests 43-101 TSX shareholders who love the idea of selling EB-5 green card certificates in Asia 3) A U.S. Senate bill in 2009 proposed a 2% to 5% royalty on the value of mineral production. Most small operators understand that they are already paying that, along with a claim rental fees, through a plan of operations "fair use fees." As roads, water rights, and forest fire protection on public lands. That bill was allowed to die by a PAC supported Congress that didn't want to stop the economic and jobs development opportunities benefits offered (?) our foreign trade partners. At the least, this would provide a bank balanced check to help calculate local tax revenues in Nevada to pay for schooling of American miner's children.
|
|
|
> The other thing wrong with the US Mining LAW of 1872 is a conflict with an upstart Securities Exchange Act of 1934 encouraging "truth in securities" REGULATIONS have somehow evolved into a support group of a protected mining investment monopoly securities system, as very lucrative IPO's, and through a very un-defendable "Blue Sky" exclusion that small private investors in a mining law state some must be insider trading qualified for already being a $1,000,000-aire. > The disparity, of the legal precedent conflicts having something with "securities" being the right to ownership connected with tradable derivatives have to do with location, which lately has been how far away mining states are away from powerful nanosecond flash trading computers. 1) In gold rush California the the people's law of governing contentious was that a handshake was all it took to form a "mining company." Contrary to Hollywood's interpretation of this, except singers Clint Eastwood and Lee Marvin in Paint Your Wagon, and the Brett Heart first hand media reports from Poker Flat supported the "Prudent Man Doctrine" that a group of investors working together really did not need Back East Blue Sky protection for being a Western widow[er] and orphan (which I happen to be). 2) After the mining camp promulgation of the rules of working together (without bloodshed, and an earned appreciation for fellow American-Chinese miners companies) were adopted into The Mining Law of 1872, there remained (to this day) the Association Placer Claim, which with eight undivided interests across 160 acres was what the Securities Law mavens consider an illegal, unregistered security. 3) And the curious fact that lode claim owners are entitled to follow extra-lateral rights, even across and underneath the surface boundaries of a mineral rights claim, even if that be private land. This is well supported by case law citations. And as a mining claim, with an assigned state number, is in effect a long term contract with the U.S. Government, those with a newly acquired GPS mentality need to be aware of the legal term, "in mineral trespass." 4) And finally, there was a mining claim ruling by a Judge, known for his non-qualified underground mineral assessment, that the value of the property dispute before him, was as worthless as the "Blue Sky above." This absolutely should be challenged today in that clean air blue sky can be measured in carbon fuel credits. Unfortunately for the 19 mineral entry states of the West, those New York City slickers somehow made the "Blue Sky Laws" the poster child of mining securities fraud. This is why there are discriminatory exclusion laws in said states concerning the qualification of investors, who apparently are not smart enough to understand unless they are have a net worth of $1,000,000 they can't play the game. Sorry Charlie, the bargain isle tuna fish red herring, who really is a sucker. >> The point of this web site of a book in progress, that I am sure will come with all sorts of pseudo Internet "secure" warning tags to get through, is that: 5) Yes, it is perfectly legal as an individual to purchase a documented value ton of a validated 1872 Mining Law mineral deposit, in place. Said ton does not need to be defined by GPS coordinates that might not fit the exact location of an a validated Bureau of Land Management / U.S. Forest Service, Plan of Action respecting, and protecting the environment. A Plan of Action, would be difficult for an small holding to qualify to dig where they feel entitled, hence the need to disqualify individual investors for not already being certified millionaires in a "good old boy securities approved private investment clubs." Small 1872 miners totally understand that their only hope is U.S. Government sensible plan of actions concerning public lands, roads, and water, prevails. Said approved citizen actions really is a bypass to the red flags of big board "casino capitalism" owners making the "you are fired" Donald Trump mistake of paying an army of lawyers, whose brief if, "those who have gold in the Banks of Bonanza Creek," rule through securities case law. 6) And that American investors, who are already at a free trade tax, and securities law disadvantage as manipulated by multinational banks "too big to jail," really need to understand that the "golden fleece" begins when sheep are corralled to be flocked, through not understanding that: A) Not making a "drop dead" deadline in paying a BLM "rental" on claims that cannot be insured by a title company, is not the same as the grace period of of a sheriffs farm sale on the courthouse steps. And, please do not block the way into the county recorders office to file a state claim (jumper) documents where the party is is totally aware they have the top default position for 90 days to formally file for a new US BLM recorded number that covers the mineral rights, no matter the made up, or slightly different, claim name. B) What a way for golden parachute CEO to survive bankruptcy, stockholder lawsuits, and reclamation obligations, without loosing anything! What a way for Toronto Stock Exchange shell game "pumped up listings" to raise millions millions through an international stock broker placements, only to step back by not meeting contract obligations, the "dumping," which causes a well touted stock (including promised options) to fall back to 01¢ per share. C) What a way, even in an Alaska with much tighter securities laws, to allow a favored nation Hong Kong/Vancouver puppet junior IPO the opportunity to take advantage of the free trade TSX "in Canadian interests" 43-101 slur that Alaskan miners are in such short supply that there was a need to allow EB-5 green cards to be sold to Asian workers. |
|
|
How does a corporate accounting of $22,500 in attorney fees, to buy into a congressionally approved "Immigrant Investor Program, to promote jobs and the local economy," only takes an advertised $500,000 to "live permanently in the USA?" Consider also the harshness of the State of Alaska's (only one of four) blue sky "protect the public" interpretations as to investor validation. That of considering all member managed LLC(ompany) certificates of ownership in a mining venture to be a security in need of counter-productive regulations? And, how is one to compete with TSX regulations that have allowed the raising of millions on the "equity" of only an earn-in options, that disappears in yet another "pump and dump"? The intent of my suggestion for the founding of a ECO-Minerals-Stockpile, would be a place the underlying claims of absolutely valid and documented projects into a secure lands and minerals trust that cannot be flipped, hypothecated, leveraged, or otherwise made worthless by derivative platform traded hedge funds. The role is to protect the title, as title insurance firms cannot do, by being the responsible party to make all the legal deadline filings and rental payments necessary to maintain a Mining Law of 1872 chain of mineral title ownership. This way, individual in-place tonnage can be sold as a unit needed in time to manufacture a valid product. This service is only paid for by a 3% royalty resulting from an actual retail sale of the "stockpiled" minerals. Which for safety reasons alone, could be a beneficiary claim owners part of a land and mineral trust. For information on our lien protected minerals claims holding trust, please go directly to the developers of what we consider fiscally viable ECO mineral projects, for not being listed on some form of a really, really "big board." So, What is the Bottom Line of this White Paper? If you are considering the romance of unpatented mining claims, somewhere West of Wickenburg, Arizona, flat out demand to see an up to date claim map, filed with up to date BLM numbers, and assessment work filing to see if the geological report matches the name of the moose pasture being issued. Do not accept a promise that a Title Insurance has the real property taken care of, as that would be an incredibly stupid thing for an AIG style insurance company, the promoter, and you to do! Bookmark this page as more chapters will be following before finally being published as a book through BannerBooks.com.....
|
|
|
 |
Copyright ©2004-2017 Mac&Murray Publishing |